USAIP Puts Framework in Place for Effective Animal ID System

Houston, Texas (March 5, 2004) – An effective national animal identification system should be based on solid standards set by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and include the adoption of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology as its foundation, according to the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA).  

In testimony given today at a field hearing of the House Agriculture Committee, NCBA President and Kansas cattle producer Jan Lyons voiced support of the proposed United States Animal Identification Plan (USAIP) as the framework for establishing a national livestock tracking system. 

“The key to effective implementation is solid standards – which USAIP provides – combined with flexibility for mode of marketing, regional differences and existing programs,” said Lyons.  “The standards of USAIP are the driving force in ensuring that the system works.” 

In the wake of the Dec. 23, 2003 BSE announcement, focus has been on animal health issues and the importance of animal identification and traceback capabilities. Lyons emphasized, however, that identification is a tool to use in conjunction with the existing animal disease surveillance and monitoring infrastructure.  “It is not a substitute for that infrastructure,” she said.

The USAIP represents two years of efforts to develop the framework for a national animal identification system that would aid in the identification and tracking of livestock for animal health and related purposes. Over 400 animal and livestock industry professionals, representing more than 70 associations, organizations and government agencies, have worked to develop consensus for a plan with the goal of tracking an animal or group of animals (back and forward) within 48 hours of an animal health incident.  

Under the guidelines of the USAIP, RFID technology will allow the industry and USDA to expedite implementation of an ID system.  “Other technologies,” Lyons added, “such as DNA, retinal imaging, boluses, and implants could be integrated into the system as standards and practical applications of the technology evolves. But RFID can be most readily integrated today into operations across the country, and producers feel that’s a good place to start.”

Lyons’s testimony proposed answers to some of the tough questions surrounding animal ID such as costs and confidentiality of information. Lyons said a cost sharing program between federal and state governments and producers would be most appropriate. Costs for full implementation of the USAIP are estimated at $545 million over six years.

In addition, confidentiality of producer information is a tremendous concern.  “Producers are extremely concerned that the information that becomes part of an animal identification system could fall into the hands of those who would use it illicitly,” Lyons said.  “For these reasons, NCBA believes that any information provided by producers for the animal identification system should be exempt from release under FOIA. Making the Privacy Act apply to data provided under this system would add an additionally layer of protection for producer privacy,” she added. 

NCBA leadership and members have been actively involved in representing beef cattle producers in the development of the USAIP, and have taken a leading role in coordinating the bovine species group.  A copy of the proposed plan and other information is posted on the U.S. Animal Identification website at www.usaip.info.